Twenty years on from his death at the age of just 27, three-time Masters champion Paul Hunter remains one of snooker’s most fondly remembered stars.
A charismatic personality and a fearless competitor, the Yorkshireman captivated audiences with his attacking style and remarkable ability to thrive under pressure.
To mark the anniversary of his passing, we look back on his extraordinary career and hear memories from some of the players he competed with.
Hunter’s wins in the Masters came in 2001, 2002 and 2004. His ice-cool ability under pressure is highlighted by the fact he won each of those finals by a 10-9 scoreline. Hunter trailed Fergal O’Brien 7-3 in the 2001 title match, was 5-1 down to Mark Williams in the 2002 final and 6-1 behind against Ronnie O’Sullivan in the 2004 showpiece.

He defeated his best friend Matthew Stevens on his way to victory in 2001, having previously not won a match in the event. The pair were inseparable on the circuit and for Stevens, his loss was felt especially strongly.
Stevens said: “It is so sad. You forget how young he was at 27. Not only the future he had in the game, we lost a special person. No doubt he would have been a World Champion many times. You look at John Higgins and Mark Williams still playing into their 50s and Paul was only 27. He had a massive future in front of him. It is really sad.
“We had one or two late nights. We were quite naughty. When we used to go to China we were pretending to be in bed by 11 but we were still out. It didn’t hold us back too much, but maybe we lost one or two matches we should have won by not going to bed until four or five in the morning. That was part of the fun of life though.
“Those Masters finals were Paul all over. He was a long way behind in a couple of them, but nothing bothered him and he took everything in his stride. From beating me in 2001, when he hated the venue, the tournament is his now and the trophy is named after him. It couldn’t be named after a better person.”
Reflecting on the 2001 final, O’Brien was disappointed not to win, but didn’t begrudge Hunter his moment in the sun and was pleased to have shared the baize with him on one of snooker’s grandest stages.
O’Brien said: “That just typified his character. We saw it again towards the end when he was playing at the Crucible during chemotherapy, it was really sad but he never gave up. It is one thing digging in during a snooker match and never giving up. To keep positive with what was happening to him and the circumstances he faced, you wouldn’t know any of that and it was testament to him.
“He had that bit of star quality and he was box office. That night was so noisy. I can actually remember when the last black went in, saying to myself to wait for the noise. It was thunderous. He was behind in the match, a very popular player and it was so noisy. Even afterwards we were still up talking to each other at six in the morning. They were lovely moments.
“At the time it was devastating. You can look back at pictures of me after the match with a blank look on my face, I was just devastated to lose. It is such a big tournament. It was really disappointing, but any of that has passed now. For me to think anything other than looking back fondly is pure self-indulgence. I’ve seen my daughter grow up, you can lose any tournament but what happened to him was terrible. It was the right result.”

Hunter edged out 1994 Masters champion Alan McManus 6-5 on his way to the 2002 final. Looking back, the Scot believes Hunter’s uncomplicated approach was central to his success on the biggest stages.
“The guy he reminds me of from the current game is Zhao Xintong. He sort of had this thing of being uncomplicated as a player. That is unusual and always has been. I think Paul was quite like that. It never looked like an effort for him to play. That struck me. He always looked like he was really enjoying it. I wish I could have taken a leaf out of that book because for most people it is a big effort. You couldn’t get him under pressure. Nothing seemed to have much of an effect on him,” said McManus.
“It was a massive loss. You never know what is going to happen, but he probably would have gone on to even still be winning now. He’d have looked after himself for sure and because his game was uncomplicated, it would have stood him well. From a snooker point of view, we will never know how much he would have won. It would have been plenty. It changes the history of the game, but he was already a big part of it. To win three Masters titles the way he did, at that age, was bonkers really.”
Hunter’s semi-final opponent in 2004 was the now four-time World Champion John Higgins. Looking back, Higgins believes Hunter reached a market far beyond that of a typical snooker fan.

Higgins said: “I think he was the next one coming after Ronnie. They were even copying hairstyles and different things, I would have loved to have tried that! He is a big miss. He was a good looking boy and he would have transcended the sport in the way O’Sullivan has as well. It is still a sad loss to our game and to a lot of the players that were close to him. I wasn’t necessarily that close to him, but you looked at him as a wee rogue. He was a guy coming in ready to take over your position in the game. He played the game with an attitude of taking the bull by the horns and going for shots.
“It was like having a tiger by the tail. He pulled different shots out and you couldn’t get on top of him. You would try to trap him in certain situations and he would have a clever enough brain to re-trap you. I also played him when he won his first tournament, the Welsh Open. He beat me in the final. He was trying to chap my room later on and get me to the party. I was obviously a bit gutted. He was that type of guy that lived life to the full.
“It is an amazing tribute to have the Masters trophy named after him. I always get emotional when I watch the final and his dad Alan is often there as well. You feel for him every time you see him. I am a father myself now and what his family has had to go through. Each time I see Alan, I give him a big hug and ask him how he is keeping.”
Triple Crown winner Shaun Murphy remembers competing against Hunter while they were coming through the junior and amateur ranks. Reflecting on his career, the Magician is thankful of the contributions Hunter made and believes that he played a huge role in where snooker is today.
“I just remember he was a cut above. When he walked in the room, he had a presence and he carried that through to his professional career,” said two-time Masters winner Murphy.
“Paul became a figurehead. He was extremely handsome and appealed to a different audience than snooker had appealed to before. That never took away from the fact that he was a wonderfully talented professional snooker player. He was a talented junior trying to make it when I first saw him and make it he did. We were lucky to have him and it is right that the Masters trophy now carries his name. We will never forget the contribution he has made to the sport.”
The thoughts of everyone at WST are with Paul’s family and friends on the anniversary of his passing.